For a century, journalists have had a voluntary ethics code. Editors are giving it an AI-era reboot
PUBLISHED Sep 1, 2026, 1:38 PM ET
The Society of Professional Journalists has proposed its first Code of Ethics revision since 2014, responding to artificial intelligence, misinformation, changing journalism careers and declining trust. The 967-word draft keeps four principles: seek truth and report it, minimize harm, act independently, and be accountable and transparent. SPJ’s 16-member Ethics Committee released it Aug. 10 and opened public feedback through Sept. 14. The draft says journalists remain responsible for accuracy and fairness regardless of tools or technologies used, while addressing fabricated content, source transparency, verification, conflicts and marginalization. It also broadens the intended audience beyond traditional newsrooms to freelancers, independent journalists and creators. The proposal remains voluntary and is not legally enforceable. SPJ’s board is scheduled to consider endorsement Sept. 25, followed by an online membership vote Oct. 1-4 if endorsed. The process follows surveys of journalists conducted this spring. If rejected, the existing 2014 code would remain in effect instead.
By James Porter | JQJO News
Left: Coverage emphasizes accountability, inclusion, misinformation, and technology’s impact on journalism. Center: Coverage stresses proposed status, unchanged principles, process, and voluntary enforcement. Right: Coverage could emphasize free-press concerns, influence, and skepticism about enforceability.
On August 10, 2026, SPJ released proposed revisions, opening feedback. https://www.spj.org/spj-ethics-committee-proposes-revisions-to-code-of-ethics/
Coverage of Story:
From Left
No left-leaning sources found for this story.
From Center
For a century, journalists have had a voluntary ethics code. Editors are giving it an AI-era reboot
JQJO Associated Press Columbia Journalism Review Nieman Journalism Lab Ethics and Journalism Ethics and Journalism Eric Deggans / Switching CodesFrom Right
No right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments