SAN JOSE, California – Investors in Adobe Inc. have filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accusing the company’s top officers and directors of misleading statements about its generative artificial intelligence strategy and the risks behind it. The complaint, filed on Tuesday, June 16, 2026, alleges that throughout 2024 and 2025 Adobe executives repeatedly reassured shareholders that its Firefly AI model was trained only on licensed content from Adobe Stock and on public domain material where copyrights had expired. According to the filing, executives promoted this approach as a commercially safe way to seize a “generational opportunity” in AI while avoiding the infringement problems facing rival generative AI systems. The plaintiffs contend those assurances were false and misleading and claim Adobe’s leaders knowingly allowed the company to rely on unauthorized copyrighted works to train its AI models. The lawsuit states that Adobe later acknowledged using copyrighted material without authorization, allegedly exposing the company to high-cost litigation from authors, artists, and other creators and eroding billions of dollars in shareholder value. The case names the company’s top officers and directors as defendants and asserts that they failed to properly disclose the legal and financial risks tied to Firefly’s training practices, despite their public emphasis on the technology’s safety and compliance. The investors are represented by attorney Frank Bottini of Bottini & Bottini.
Prepared by Christopher Adams and reviewed by editorial team.
No left-leaning sources found for this story.
No right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments