WASHINGTON. The Supreme Court on Monday set aside appeals-court rulings and sent two cases involving Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act back to lower courts, ordering further consideration of whether private individuals and advocacy groups can sue to challenge state legislative maps drawn after the 2020 Census. In the North Dakota case, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that only the federal government can sue to enforce Section 2; the Supreme Court previously blocked that ruling in July, allowing the Native American tribes’ preferred maps to remain temporarily in place while the case proceeds. WASHINGTON. The action also affects a separate Mississippi challenge where similar reasoning had been cited, and the high court returned that appeal for reconsideration. Advocacy groups, which bring most Section 2 lawsuits, remain central to enforcement questions that the lower courts will now reassess. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, writing that both rulings should have been reversed. The decision follows the court’s April ruling that narrowed Section 2 claims by requiring proof of intentional discrimination, a ruling that has already diluted the Voting Rights Act’s enforcement power and made future cases harder to win.
Prepared by Lauren Mitchell and reviewed by editorial team.
您的投票权可能会受到影响。最高法院的裁决可能会影响谁可以挑战各州投票地图。这包括您投票的地图。如果您属于某个倡导团体,您争取公平投票的能力可能会发生变化。
最高法院的举动搅动了围绕投票权的争议。此举将如何发展尚不清楚。但可以肯定的是,争取公平投票权的斗争并未结束。请关注您的州将如何应对。如果您相信平等的投票权,值得转发。
最高法院的命令暂时保留了部落偏好的地图,并要求下级法院重新评估,维持现状,从而在进一步审查期间将他们的地图保留到位,使美洲原住民部落和倡导团体受益。
北达科他州和密西西比州的州地图赞助商和官员在上诉法院的不利裁决被撤销,重新审议,给负责这些地图的州议员和选举官员带来了法律上的不确定性。
No left-leaning sources found for this story.
No right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments