Federal Judge Dismisses Trump's $10B Lawsuit Against WSJ
Read, Watch or Listen
Washington: U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles dismissed President Donald Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch on Monday, finding the complaint failed to plausibly allege that the newspaper published the article with actual malice regarding a sexually suggestive letter tied to Jeffrey Epstein. The judge permitted Trump leave to file an amended complaint but noted the plaintiff had not demonstrated malice; Trump filed the suit in July after the Journal published the letter, which Congress had subpoenaed and released from Epstein's estate, and Trump has denied writing the letter, calling the report false and defamatory.
Prepared by Emily Rhodes and reviewed by editorial team.
Timeline of Events
- 2003: Album compiled for Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday included a letter later reported by press.
- Congress subpoenaed and subsequently released records from Epstein's estate that included the letter.
- July: President Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch.
- Monday: U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles dismissed the complaint for failing to allege actual malice.
- The court granted Trump leave to file an amended complaint, preserving a procedural pathway.
Why This Matters to You
This case highlights the high bar for defamation suits. To win, plaintiffs must prove "actual malice" - that the publisher knowingly lied or recklessly disregarded the truth. It's a reminder to critically evaluate news sources and their reporting standards.
The Bottom Line
While Trump's initial complaint was dismissed, he's been granted leave to file an amended one. This means the legal battle isn't over yet. Stay informed by following trusted news outlets for updates. Worth forwarding if you know someone interested in media law cases.
- Articles Published:
- 4
- Right Leaning:
- 0
- Left Leaning:
- 0
- Neutral:
- 4
- Distribution:
- Left 0%, Center 100%, Right 0%
The Wall Street Journal and other news organizations benefited as the court’s dismissal upheld the requirement that public figures plausibly allege actual malice, limiting large defamation awards absent specific malice while preserving reporters’ ability to publish subpoenaed historical records.
President Donald Trump and his legal team suffered a procedural loss when the federal judge dismissed the $10 billion suit for failing to allege actual malice, though the court granted leave to file an amended complaint.
Coverage of Story:
From Left
No left-leaning sources found for this story.
From Center
Federal Judge Dismisses Trump's $10B Lawsuit Against WSJ
Brisbane Times WAtoday Economic Times PBS.orgFrom Right
No right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments