CRIME & LAW

Washington court lets Herridge contempt fine proceed

▪

Read, Watch or Listen

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined an emergency appeal from journalist Catherine Herridge, allowing an $800-per-day civil contempt fine to stand while she continues refusing to identify a confidential source. Herridge, a former Fox News reporter, was held in contempt by a federal judge after declining to disclose who provided her with investigative materials used in 2017 stories about Chinese American scientist Yanping Chen. Chen had been investigated for years by the FBI over alleged ties to a Chinese military astronaut program but was never charged. In 2018, Chen sued the FBI and Justice Department, alleging illegal leaks under the Privacy Act.

Prepared by Emily Rhodes and reviewed by editorial team.

Timeline of Events

2011 Chen investigated over immigration statements
2017 Herridge publishes Fox reports on Chen
2017 Articles allege ties to Chinese military
2018 Chen files Privacy Act lawsuit
Recent months Federal judge holds Herridge contempt
Recent months Court imposes $800 daily fine
This week Supreme Court rejects emergency intervention

Why This Matters to You

This case highlights the tension between press freedom and legal obligations. Journalists often rely on confidential sources to expose important stories. But, they can face legal consequences for protecting those sources. If you value investigative journalism, keep an eye on how this unfolds.

The Bottom Line

Journalist Catherine Herridge is facing a hefty daily fine for protecting her source. This is a reminder of the risks journalists take to bring us the truth. Worth forwarding if you know someone who appreciates the work of investigative reporters.