Montgomery, Alabama — Attorney General Steve Marshall on Wednesday filed emergency motions asking the U.S. Supreme Court to allow the state to use the Legislature’s 2023 congressional map following a ruling that changed the legal standard for racial gerrymandering. Marshall filed motions in Allen v. Singleton, Allen v. Milligan and Allen v. Caster, seeking reconsideration under the new standard. State leaders acted one day after the Supreme Court rejected Louisiana’s map in a decision that requires proof of intentional racial discrimination; Governor Kay Ivey announced a special session Friday to consider new maps if the Court clears the way, and Secretary of State Wes Allen asked the justices to expedite review, while courts’ prior orders had installed a map creating a second majority-Black district used in recent elections.
Prepared by Lauren Mitchell and reviewed by editorial team.
This isn't just about Alabama. It's about voting rights and fair representation nationwide. If the Supreme Court allows Alabama's map, it could set a precedent for other states too. Keep an eye on this case. It could affect how your state draws its own maps.
The Supreme Court's decision could reshape the racial gerrymandering standard. It's a complex issue, but it boils down to this: fair representation for all citizens. Worth forwarding if you believe in the power of every vote.
Republican state leaders and the Legislature sought to restore the 2023 map, which could increase Republican representation and strengthen party control over district lines if the Supreme Court allows its use.
Black voters and voting-rights advocates who benefited from a court-ordered map that created a second majority-Black district may see reduced representation and increased legal uncertainty if the legislature's map is reinstated.
Alabama asks Supreme Court to revive legislature’s congressional map
https://www.wbrc.com WPMIAG Marshall asks Supreme Court to revisit congressional map ruling
Alabama Political Reporter
Comments