RICHMOND, Va. The Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday over whether to block a voter-approved constitutional amendment that authorized a mid-decade congressional redistricting plan drawn by Democrats; plaintiffs say the General Assembly violated procedural requirements when placing the measure on the ballot. The map, approved by voters last week, could net Democrats up to four additional U.S. House seats ahead of November's elections. Justices questioned attorneys Monday, signaling skepticism of defense arguments; if the court invalidates the amendment the referendum and map would be void, potentially changing projected House outcomes. Republicans argue the amendment failed a two-session requirement because early voting had already begun before an initial passage, while Democrats maintain Election Day, not early voting start, satisfies timing rules and preserves the vote.
Prepared by Lauren Mitchell and reviewed by editorial team.
此案涉及您的投票权。其结果可能会改变弗吉尼亚州的政治格局,甚至可能影响美国众议院。这是一个提醒,让您了解当地的投票程序。请查看您所在州的关于选票提案和提前投票的规定。
弗吉尼亚州最高法院的裁决可能会改变国会的权力平衡。这是一场关于投票规则和时间的高风险法律战。如果你认识弗吉尼亚州的人或者对投票权感兴趣,值得转发。
如果该地图得以保留,民主党将有望获得多达四席美国众议院席位,从而改善其在十一月期中选举中的选举前景,并加强其在竞争性选区的地位。
如果地图被认为无效,共和党候选人和挑战者将失去他们声称通过不当程序步骤获得的选举地图结果,这可能会保留当前选区划分。
No right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments