POLITICS

Lyndsey Brunette Enters 2027 Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

PUBLISHED Apr 16, 2026, 9:40 AM ET

Read, Watch or Listen

Media Bias Meter

Sources: 4

Left 25%

Center 75%

Sources: 4

Neillsville, Wis. Clark County Circuit Court Judge Lyndsey Brunette announced her campaign for the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday, April 16, entering the 2027 race to replace Justice Annette Ziegler, who has said she will not seek reelection. Brunette released a campaign video and cited protecting fundamental rights, voting access and public safety as central priorities. Madison observers noted Brunette is considered a liberal candidate with a judicial tenure since 2018 and prior service as Clark County district attorney; her announcement follows recent Supreme Court contests that increased the court’s liberal majority last week. Her campaign sets up a contested 2027 election, with fundraising, endorsements and scrutiny expected this year.

By Lauren Mitchell | JQJO News

Timeline of Events

2012: Lyndsey Brunette elected Clark County District Attorney as a Democrat.
2018: Brunette began serving as Clark County Circuit Court judge.
Earlier this year: Justice Annette Ziegler announced she will not seek reelection for 2027.
Early April: Judge Chris Taylor won a Supreme Court race, expanding the liberal majority.
April 16: Brunette announced her 2027 Wisconsin Supreme Court campaign and released a video.

News Intelligence

Judge Brunette's campaign could impact your rights and public safety. She's focusing on voting access and fundamental rights. If you're in Wisconsin, her decisions could affect you directly. Watch her campaign video to learn more.

Media Bias

Articles Published:: 4
Right Leaning:: 0
Left Leaning:: 1
Neutral:: 3

Who Benefited

Liberal-aligned legal organizations, progressive voters, and candidates favoring judicial interpretations that protect voting and healthcare rights stand to benefit if Brunette’s campaign helps sustain or expand the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s liberal majority.

Who Impacted

Conservative advocacy groups, voters seeking a conservative judicial majority, and stakeholders preferring more restrictive rulings may lose influence over state precedent if the court’s composition shifts further toward liberal justices.

Media Bias