Washington — U.S. lawmakers this week publicly and privately heard testimony about a Sept. 2 operation in which U.S. forces destroyed an alleged drug boat and later fired on survivors, part of a campaign that has eliminated more than 20 vessels and killed over 80 people. Navy Adm. Frank Bradley told committees he ordered the initial strikes and denied an order to "kill them all," while Democratic lawmakers contested the mission's scope. Separately, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth faces scrutiny over using Signal to discuss an upcoming Yemen operation, prompting calls for accountability. Based on 6 articles reviewed and supporting research.
Administration officials and proponents of the maritime counter-narcotics campaign retained a platform to defend the strikes as deterrence, while the president’s office maintained public support for senior defense leadership, according to cited administration statements and a CSIS expert quoted in coverage.
Families of those killed, critics in Congress, and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth faced intensified scrutiny, hearings, and reputational pressure after testimony about the Sept. 2 strikes and revelations about use of Signal in operational discussions.
After reading and researching latest news.... Congressional testimony confirmed a Sept. 2 strike destroyed an alleged drug boat and subsequent fire killed survivors; Adm. Bradley testified and denied a 'kill-all' order; Secretary Pete Hegseth faces scrutiny over Signal use and operational oversight amid bipartisan questions and ongoing congressional review continues.
No left-leaning sources found for this story.
Congress Probes U.S. Boat Strikes and Defence Secretary
thepeterboroughexaminer.com The Star ExBulletin GEO TV Malay Mail The Straits TimesNo right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments