Supreme Court Accused of Favoring Moneyed Interests | JQJO

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a scathing dissent in a 7-2 Supreme Court ruling favoring fuel producers challenging California's vehicle emission regulations. Jackson argued the court favors 'moneyed interests', citing a perceived bias towards corporate interests and a reluctance to hear cases involving less powerful plaintiffs. She expressed concern about the court's reputation and the ruling's potential impact on future Clean Air Act challenges. Justice Kavanaugh refuted these claims, highlighting instances where liberal justices prevailed. Legal experts offer differing perspectives on the court's alleged bias.