Read, Watch or Listen

Eight female athletes appealed the House v. NCAA settlement, arguing its $2.8 billion back-damage distribution violates Title IX. The appeal, focusing solely on back damages, claims the calculation disproportionately favors male athletes, potentially depriving women of $1.1 billion. The Ninth Circuit will hear the appeal, temporarily halting back-damage payments. The judge's previous dismissal of Title IX objections in the settlement approval is challenged, highlighting discrepancies between antitrust and gender equity legal frameworks.

Prepared by Emily Rhodes and reviewed by editorial team.