Supreme Court Hearing Features Heated Exchange on Disability Discrimination
Tap title to read story
The US Supreme Court heard arguments in A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, a case concerning liability for school districts discriminating against disabled students. A heated exchange occurred between Justice Gorsuch and attorney Lisa Blatt, with Blatt accused of misrepresenting her client's position. The justices debated whether a heightened "bad faith" standard applies to all disability claims against schools or just those involving educational services. The court seemed hesitant to address the broader question, concerned about a lack of briefing and potential confusion for lower courts. The case highlights the complexities of disability law and the varying standards applied in educational settings.
The US Supreme Court heard arguments in A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, a case concerning liability for school districts discriminating against disabled students. A heated exchange occurred between Justice Gorsuch and attorney Lisa Blatt, with Blatt accused of misrepresenting her client's position. The justices debated whether a heightened "bad faith" standard applies to all disability claims against schools or just those involving educational services. The court seemed hesitant to address the broader question, concerned about a lack of briefing and potential confusion for lower courts. The case highlights the complexities of disability law and the varying standards applied in educational settings.
More context
Sources
JQJO Editorial Desk · Human reviewed · AI assisted. Report a correction.
