Skip to news
JQJO
Latest

Washington court bolsters White House power over TPS | JQJO

Washington court bolsters White House power over TPS

Washington court bolsters White House power over TPS

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:44

The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington has ruled that federal courts generally lack authority to review decisions by the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate or terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for foreign nationals. In a 6–3 decision along ideological lines in Mullin v. Doe and Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the justices upheld broad executive discretion over the humanitarian program. The ruling, issued in 2026, allows the Trump administration to proceed with plans announced in late 2025 to end TPS protections for Syrians and Haitians, affecting part of the roughly 1.3 million people covered under TPS from 17 countries.

Published · Published by JQJO

Published by JQJO Editorial Desk · AI assisted

More context

Timeline

  1. 1990 Congress creates Temporary Protected Status program
  2. Early 2026 About 1.3 million people hold TPS
  3. Late 2025 Trump administration announces ending Syrian TPS
  4. Late 2025 Administration also moves to end Haitian TPS
  5. 2026 Supreme Court hears consolidated Mullin cases
  6. 2026 Court rules 6–3 limiting TPS judicial review
  7. 2026 Decision clears path to terminate specific TPS designations

Why it matters

This ruling affects the lives of 1.3 million TPS holders from 17 countries, including Syrians and Haitians. If you know someone under TPS, their status could change. It's a good time to check in and offer support.

JQJO Editorial Desk · Human reviewed · AI assisted. Report a correction.

Editorial policy and corrections · Our team

Tech Coalition Pushes Federal Preemption

Tap title to read story

A powerful coalition of federal legislators, executive branch officials, and multinational technology corporations has coalesced around a strategy of "federal preemption," seeking to strip state governments of their authority over generative AI. The coalition argues that the legal frameworks governing these technologies are in a state of flux as generative AI affects every sector of the economy, from healthcare diagnostics to creative industries. The push aims to centralize regulation at the federal level, limiting state‑level oversight of AI development and deployment.

0:00 / 0:32

BOEM Approves Largest U.S. Offshore

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:17

Apple’s Intel Era Shaped PC

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:12

JQJO

Find your next story

Search JQJO’s current coverage.