Skip to news
JQJO
Latest

Washington: Acting intelligence chief orders sweeping ODNI cuts | JQJO

Washington: Acting intelligence chief orders sweeping ODNI cuts

Washington: Acting intelligence chief orders sweeping ODNI cuts

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:51

Acting Director of National Intelligence William “Bill” Pulte has initiated substantial personnel reductions at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) shortly after assuming the role on June 19, 2026, following Tulsi Gabbard’s resignation. According to multiple intelligence sources and internal agency logs, Pulte dismissed six political appointees chosen by Gabbard and removed 45 career intelligence officials from active ODNI roles, directing their return to their home agencies. The cuts are concentrated in the National Counterterrorism Center and the National Counterintelligence and Security Center. The White House has confirmed the changes, citing President Donald Trump’s explicit directive for an immediate workforce reduction.

Published · Published by JQJO

Published by JQJO Editorial Desk · AI assisted

More context

Timeline

  1. June 18, 2026 Pulte arrives early at ODNI
  2. June 18, 2026 Requests full ODNI employee roster
  3. June 19, 2026 Pulte becomes acting intelligence chief
  4. June 19, 2026 Gabbard resigns citing family reasons
  5. June 2026 Six Gabbard-appointed political officials dismissed
  6. June 2026 Forty-five career officers reassigned agencies
  7. June 2026 Cuts focus NCTC and NCSC units
  8. June 2026 Trump publicly confirms workforce reduction order

Why it matters

These cuts at ODNI could impact national security. Fewer people watching for threats means increased risk. If you're concerned, write to your local representative. Ask how they plan to address these changes.

JQJO Editorial Desk · Human reviewed · AI assisted. Report a correction.

Editorial policy and corrections · Our team

Tech Coalition Pushes Federal Preemption

Tap title to read story

A powerful coalition of federal legislators, executive branch officials, and multinational technology corporations has coalesced around a strategy of "federal preemption," seeking to strip state governments of their authority over generative AI. The coalition argues that the legal frameworks governing these technologies are in a state of flux as generative AI affects every sector of the economy, from healthcare diagnostics to creative industries. The push aims to centralize regulation at the federal level, limiting state‑level oversight of AI development and deployment.

0:00 / 0:32

Apple’s Intel Era Shaped PC

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:12

JQJO

Find your next story

Search JQJO’s current coverage.