Skip to news
JQJO
Latest

South Carolina GOP runoff features Trump dual endorsement | JQJO

South Carolina GOP runoff features Trump dual endorsement

South Carolina GOP runoff features Trump dual endorsement

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:45

Columbia, South Carolina. Voters returned to the polls Tuesday for a Republican gubernatorial runoff between Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette and Attorney General Alan Wilson after no candidate secured a majority in the June 9 primary; President Donald Trump had initially endorsed Evette and then announced on Friday he would endorse both contenders.

The winner will advance to the November general election in what is the state's first open governor's race since 2010, and candidates emphasized county-level strength and grassroots outreach this week; counties such as Beaufort and Jasper favored Evette while Wilson showed pockets of support in Hampton and Colleton, and campaign advertising intensified.

Published · Published by JQJO

Published by JQJO Editorial Desk · AI assisted

More context

Timeline

  1. 1. 2010: Last open South Carolina gubernatorial race occurred; sets historical context.
  2. 2. 9th June: Primary election held; no candidate achieved a majority, triggering a runoff.
  3. 3. Post-primary: President Trump initially endorsed Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette.
  4. 4. Late campaign: Alan Wilson gained momentum in several Lowcountry counties following the primary.
  5. 5. Friday before runoff: Trump announced dual endorsements; voters returned to polls Tuesday for the runoff.

Why it matters

This runoff impacts your community. The governor's decisions can affect taxes, education, and local services in South Carolina. If you're a voter, check your county's results. It's a chance to see how your neighbors voted and what issues might matter most to them.

Sources

JQJO Editorial Desk · Human reviewed · AI assisted. Report a correction.

Editorial policy and corrections · Our team

Tech Coalition Pushes Federal Preemption

Tap title to read story

A powerful coalition of federal legislators, executive branch officials, and multinational technology corporations has coalesced around a strategy of "federal preemption," seeking to strip state governments of their authority over generative AI. The coalition argues that the legal frameworks governing these technologies are in a state of flux as generative AI affects every sector of the economy, from healthcare diagnostics to creative industries. The push aims to centralize regulation at the federal level, limiting state‑level oversight of AI development and deployment.

0:00 / 0:32

Apple’s Intel Era Shaped PC

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:12

JQJO

Find your next story

Search JQJO’s current coverage.