Skip to news
JQJO
Latest

Ohio Governor urges abolition of state's death penalty | JQJO

Ohio Governor urges abolition of state's death penalty

Ohio Governor urges abolition of state's death penalty

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:44

Columbus, Ohio — On Tuesday Gov. Mike DeWine urged the Ohio Legislature to abolish the state's death penalty, saying at a June 16 press conference that he no longer believes capital punishment deters murder and that the moral justification he once held no longer exists; he recalled co-sponsoring the 1981 reinstatement of the penalty.

DeWine asked lawmakers to act or allow a public vote, noting Ohio has not carried out an execution since 2018 and that scheduled execution dates commonly face more than two-decade delays; former Attorney General Dave Yost has criticized the effective moratorium, and officials now face possible legislative or ballot options in the near term.

Published · Published by JQJO

Published by JQJO Editorial Desk · AI assisted

More context

Timeline

  1. 1. 1980: Mike DeWine elected to Ohio State Senate.
  2. 2. 1981: DeWine co-sponsored legislation reinstating Ohio's modern death penalty.
  3. 3. 2018: Ohio performed its most recent execution.
  4. 4. 2019: DeWine became governor and started postponing executions.
  5. 5. 2024, June 16: DeWine publicly called for abolition of the death penalty.

Why it matters

Governor DeWine's call to end Ohio's death penalty could impact your rights and community. If you're an Ohio resident, you might get a say in this through a public vote. Stay informed on this issue. Check your local news for updates on legislative or ballot options.

Sources

JQJO Editorial Desk · Human reviewed · AI assisted. Report a correction.

Editorial policy and corrections · Our team

New Pill Promises Hair Regrowth

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:40

Build a Cheap Home Server in

Tap title to read story

0:00 / 0:36

Tech Coalition Pushes Federal Preemption

Tap title to read story

A powerful coalition of federal legislators, executive branch officials, and multinational technology corporations has coalesced around a strategy of "federal preemption," seeking to strip state governments of their authority over generative AI. The coalition argues that the legal frameworks governing these technologies are in a state of flux as generative AI affects every sector of the economy, from healthcare diagnostics to creative industries. The push aims to centralize regulation at the federal level, limiting state‑level oversight of AI development and deployment.

0:00 / 0:32

JQJO

Find your next story

Search JQJO’s current coverage.