Theme:
Light Dark Auto
GeneralTop StoriesPoliticsBusinessEconomyTechnologyInternationalEnvironmentScienceSportsHealthEducationEntertainmentLifestyleCultureCrime & LawTravel & TourismFood & RecipesFact CheckReligion
POLITICS
Neutral Sentiment

PG&E和公用事业公司花费至少1350万美元反对州长候选人斯泰尔

Read, Watch or Listen

Media Bias Meter
Sources: 5
Center 100%
Sources: 5

SACRAMENTO: Pacific Gas & Electric has spent at least $13.5 million this year to oppose gubernatorial candidate Tom Steyer, according to state campaign filings, and other major utilities have contributed to committees backing the anti-Steyer effort. Steyer, a billionaire and former hedge fund founder turned environmental advocate, has repeatedly accused PG&E, San Diego Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison of raking in record profits, driving up customer bills and causing deadly wildfires with faulty equipment. He has welcomed the attacks as proof he is taking on powerful special interests and has framed the spending as evidence of entrenched influence in Sacramento. LOS ANGELES: The dispute underscores heavy corporate political spending and organized opposition: the California Chamber of Commerce political action committee collected at least $2 million each from PG&E, Sempra and Edison and has funneled $9.75 million to the anti-Steyer committee, which has pointed to Steyer’s reported spending of more than $200 million on his bid for governor. Steyer is competing to advance past the June primary and has trailed some rivals in recent polls. He says he would not dismantle the utilities but would appoint reform-minded regulators, seek lower rates, expand battery storage and rooftop and community solar. Audits of wildfire-related utility spending from 2019 to 2020 found about $2.5 billion that could not be accounted for, and utilities opposed a bill to require independent audits of such spending.

Prepared by Lauren Mitchell and reviewed by editorial team.

Timeline of Events

  • 汤姆·斯泰尔在对冲基金职业生涯后,成为一位备受瞩目的环保倡导者。
  • 斯泰尔发起州长竞选,并公开批评加州主要电力公司。
  • 州竞选文件显示,PG&E 花费了至少 1350 万美元反对斯泰尔。
  • AdImpact 报告称,斯泰尔今年在广告上花费或预订了约 1.95 亿美元。
  • 这次竞选的特点是前所未有的广告支出和对电力公司政治影响力的加强审查。

Why This Matters to You

这场选举可能会影响你的水电费账单以及加利福尼亚州应对野火的策略。如果施泰尔获胜,他承诺会降低费率并任命倡导改革的监管者。他还计划扩大电池储能和太阳能发电。请关注你当地的新闻,了解这场选举的最新动态。

The Bottom Line

这是一场亿万富翁环保主义者与电力巨头之间的殊死搏斗。它提醒我们金钱在政治中可以有多大的影响力。如果您关心水电费或山火管理问题,不妨研究一下候选人的立场。如果您认识加州的朋友,值得转发。

Media Bias
Articles Published:
4
Right Leaning:
0
Left Leaning:
0
Neutral:
4

Who Benefited

太平洋煤气电力公司(Pacific Gas & Electric)及其他公用事业公司通过花费至少 1350 万美元反对汤姆·斯蒂尔(Tom Steyer)来增加了政治影响力,同时广告公司和政治顾问也从与州长竞选相关的巨额广告购买中获利。

Who Impacted

加州纳税人和受野火影响的社区面临潜在后果,因为在人们持续批评账单和与设备相关的火灾之际,公用事业公司将大量资金分配给了政治支出。

Media Bias
Articles Published:
4
Right Leaning:
0
Left Leaning:
0
Neutral:
4
Distribution:
Left 0%, Center 100%, Right 0%
Who Benefited

太平洋煤气电力公司(Pacific Gas & Electric)及其他公用事业公司通过花费至少 1350 万美元反对汤姆·斯蒂尔(Tom Steyer)来增加了政治影响力,同时广告公司和政治顾问也从与州长竞选相关的巨额广告购买中获利。

Who Impacted

加州纳税人和受野火影响的社区面临潜在后果,因为在人们持续批评账单和与设备相关的火灾之际,公用事业公司将大量资金分配给了政治支出。

Coverage of Story:

From Left

No left-leaning sources found for this story.

From Center

PG&E和公用事业公司花费至少1350万美元反对州长候选人斯泰尔

Los Angeles Times DNyuz Santa Rosa Press Democrat My Northwest
From Right

No right-leaning sources found for this story.

Related News

Comments

JQJO App
Get JQJO App
Read news faster on our app
GET