Virginia Supreme Court Hears Challenge To Congressional Map
Tap title to read story
RICHMOND, Va. The Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday over whether to block a voter-approved constitutional amendment that authorized a mid-decade congressional redistricting plan drawn by Democrats; plaintiffs say the General Assembly violated procedural requirements when placing the measure on the ballot. The map, approved by voters last week, could net Democrats up to four additional U.S. House seats ahead of November's elections.
Justices questioned attorneys Monday, signaling skepticism of defense arguments; if the court invalidates the amendment the referendum and map would be void, potentially changing projected House outcomes. Republicans argue the amendment failed a two-session requirement because early voting had already begun before an initial passage, while Democrats maintain Election Day, not early voting start, satisfies timing rules and preserves the vote.
More context
Timeline
- 1. State lawmakers passed a constitutional amendment authorizing mid-decade redistricting.
- 2. Voters approved the amendment in a statewide referendum last week.
- 3. Republicans filed lawsuits challenging the amendment's placement on the ballot.
- 4. The Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the challenge Monday.
- 5. The court will decide whether to invalidate the amendment, affecting November projections.
Why it matters
This case affects your voting rights. The outcome could change the political landscape of Virginia, and potentially, the U.S. House. It's a reminder to stay informed about local voting procedures. Check your state's rules on ballot measures and early voting.
Sources
JQJO Editorial Desk · Human reviewed · AI assisted. Report a correction.
