CULTURE

Ohio lawmakers introduce bill naming Loveland Frog cryptid

PUBLISHED Apr 20, 2026, 7:04 AM ET

Read, Watch or Listen

Media Bias Meter

Sources: 4

Center 100%

Sources: 4

Columbus, Ohio. A bipartisan pair of state representatives introduced House Bill 821 on April 13 to designate the Loveland Frogman as Ohio's official state cryptid, proposing a new section of state law that describes the creature as a frog-like, bipedal amphibian roughly four feet tall and tied to local folklore. This week sponsors Reps. Tristan Rader and Jean Schmidt issued a joint statement on April 15 framing the measure as a celebration of community identity and cultural heritage; reporting notes the legend’s origins in the 1950s, police sightings in March 1972, and the legend’s role in local tourism, merchandise, festivals and a 2023 film.

By Yusra M. | JQJO News

Timeline of Events

1950s: Initial reports and origin of the Loveland Frog legend.
March 1972: Two police officers reported separate sightings of the Frogman.
2023: A found-footage horror film inspired by the Loveland Frog was released.
April 13 (reported year): Reps. Tristan Rader and Jean Schmidt introduced House Bill 821 to name the Loveland Frog Ohio's official cryptid.
April 15 (reported year): Sponsors released a joint statement framing the bill as a celebration of community identity.

News Intelligence

This isn't just about a frogman legend. It's about celebrating local folklore and community identity. If you're an Ohio resident, it's a nod to your cultural heritage. If you're a fan of cryptids, it's a fun addition to the list.

Media Bias

Articles Published:: 4
Right Leaning:: 0
Left Leaning:: 0
Neutral:: 4
Distribution:: Left 0%, Center 100%, Right 0%

Who Benefited

Local businesses, tourism operators, and event organizers in Loveland benefited from increased attention, merchandise sales, festivals, and media tied to the Loveland Frog legend as noted in reporting.

Who Impacted

No individuals or groups were documented as harmed in the articles; reporters did not identify direct negative impacts resulting from the bill proposal.