Judge Blocks DOJ Subpoenas Targeting Federal Reserve Chair
Tap title to read story
WASHINGTON. A federal judge on March 11 quashed Justice Department grand jury subpoenas issued in January to the Federal Reserve and targeting Chair Jerome Powell, finding the government offered little evidence and the subpoenas appeared designed to pressure Powell to cut interest rates or resign. Powell disclosed the investigation on Jan. 11 after testimony about a $2.5 billion building renovation. The ruling said subpoenas’ dominant purpose was harassment; U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said she will appeal. The decision has delayed Senate consideration of a Fed nominee and drawn criticism on Capitol Hill. Based on 8 articles reviewed and supporting research.
More context
Timeline
- 1. June (previous year): Powell testifies about a $2.5 billion Fed building renovation.
- 2. Jan. 11: Powell discloses the Federal Reserve received grand jury subpoenas from the Justice Department.
- 3. January: DOJ, through U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, issues subpoenas seeking Fed records related to Powell.
- 4. March 11: Judge James Boasberg quashes the subpoenas, finding they lacked evidentiary support and appeared pretextual.
- 5. After ruling: Pirro announces an intent to appeal; Senate consideration of a Fed nominee is delayed.
Why it matters
This legal tussle could impact your wallet. If the Federal Reserve is pressured into cutting interest rates, it could affect your savings, loans, and investments. Keep an eye on any changes to the Fed's policies.
Sources
JQJO Editorial Desk · Human reviewed · AI assisted. Report a correction.
