Los Angeles, opening arguments began in a Los Angeles County Superior Court case accusing Meta and Alphabet’s YouTube of deliberately designing platforms that addict children, a trial plaintiffs’ lawyers compare to tobacco litigation. Plaintiffs seek liability for harms including depression and self-harm stemming from youth engagement. Separately in Santa Fe, New Mexico, state prosecutors opened a trial alleging Meta prioritized ad revenue over youth safety and exposed teens to sexual exploitation, citing internal documents. Defendants deny wrongdoing and cite safety tools. Jury proceedings will test claims that could shape future litigation nationwide. Based on 7 articles reviewed and supporting research.
Prepared by Emily Rhodes and reviewed by editorial team.
If plaintiffs succeed, plaintiffs, families, public-health advocates and regulators could gain accountability, policy changes and stricter industry standards; if defendants prevail, platforms preserve existing business models and avoid major liability precedents.
Children and families who experienced harm from platform exposure have suffered mental-health and exploitation impacts; technology companies may suffer reputational, legal and financial consequences depending on trial outcomes.
No left-leaning sources found for this story.
Trials target social platforms over youth addiction claims
Free Malaysia Today WKMG WRAL The Star WAOW 2 News Nevada Albuquerque JournalNo right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments