Cheyenne, Wyoming. The state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that two laws banning abortion, including the nation's first explicit pill ban, violate Wyoming's constitution and therefore cannot take effect. The court sided with Wellspring Health Access, Chelsea's Fund and four women who cited a 2012 health-care amendment protecting competent adults' decisions. State attorneys argued abortion is not health care. Governor Mark Gordon urged a voter constitutional amendment. Separately, Ohio lawmakers have proposed restrictive bills despite a November 2023 amendment protecting abortion rights. Based on 6 articles reviewed and supporting research.
This 60-second summary was prepared by the JQJO editorial team after reviewing 6 original reports from KSTU, 2 News Nevada, PBS.org, WSBT, NBC4i and Oil City News.
Patients seeking abortion services in Wyoming retain legal access after the court invalidated the two bans, preserving both clinic-based care and medication abortion availability.
State officials and anti-abortion advocates face legal and political setbacks after the Wyoming Supreme Court invalidated laws they supported and may need to pursue a constitutional amendment or further litigation.
After reading and researching latest news.... Wyoming's Supreme Court struck down two 2023 abortion bans, including an explicit medication ban, citing the 2012 health-care amendment; plaintiffs included Wellspring Health Access and Chelsea's Fund, while Governor Gordon urged a voter amendment and Ohio lawmakers pursue conflicting bills.
No left-leaning sources found for this story.
Wyoming court strikes down explicit abortion bans, pills
KSTU 2 News Nevada PBS.org WSBT NBC4i
Comments