POLITICS

Court Restores FEMA Mitigation Funding After Lawsuit

PUBLISHED Dec 11, 2025, 9:25 PM ET

Read, Watch or Listen

Court Restores FEMA Mitigation Funding After Lawsuit

Media Bias Meter

Sources: 7

Center 100%

Sources: 7

Boston — A federal court on Thursday ordered restoration of FEMA's Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities grant program, ruling the administration unlawfully terminated its funding. Judge Richard Stearns sided with a coalition of state attorneys general, finding the executive branch lacked authority to divert Congress-appropriated funds. The order requires FEMA to reinstate BRIC grants and reversed cancellations that halted mitigation projects such as safe rooms and flood protections. State officials noted the program invested billions and generated estimated savings per dollar spent. Federal agencies may respond. Appeals or administrative responses may follow. Based on 6 articles reviewed and supporting research.

By Lauren Mitchell | JQJO News

Timeline of Events

2018: Congress passed Disaster Recovery Reform Act establishing BRIC-related mitigation authority.
BRIC funded mitigation projects nationwide, with articles reporting roughly $5 billion invested since passage.
April (reported): FEMA announced plans to terminate the BRIC program and cease related grants.
State attorneys general filed lawsuits challenging FEMA's termination as unlawful; coalitions of states joined litigation.
Federal courts issued rulings ordering restoration of BRIC funding and reinstatement of canceled mitigation projects.

Media Bias

Articles Published:: 7
Right Leaning:: 0
Left Leaning:: 0
Neutral:: 7

Who Benefited

State and local governments, residents in hazard-prone areas, and contractors benefited because the court restored BRIC funding, allowing mitigation projects and allocated funds to proceed.

Who Impacted

Communities that had projects halted, localities awaiting grants, and residents exposed to disaster risks suffered delays and uncertainty when FEMA attempted to cancel BRIC funding.

Media Bias

Articles Published:: 7
Right Leaning:: 0
Left Leaning:: 0
Neutral:: 7
Distribution:: Left 0%, Center 100%, Right 0%

Who Benefited

State and local governments, residents in hazard-prone areas, and contractors benefited because the court restored BRIC funding, allowing mitigation projects and allocated funds to proceed.

Who Impacted

Communities that had projects halted, localities awaiting grants, and residents exposed to disaster risks suffered delays and uncertainty when FEMA attempted to cancel BRIC funding.