Washington — Federal and state officials continued legal disputes this week over President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to U.S. cities. Appeals court judges on Thursday temporarily paused a lower court’s order that would have ended deployments in Washington, D.C., while judges in California questioned federal authority over state guard forces. South Carolina’s attorney general led a 24-state brief supporting the deployments, and state attorneys general argued the deployments address public-safety concerns after recent violence. Court deadlines and appeals remain active, and judges noted the stays do not decide case merits. Based on 6 articles reviewed and supporting research.
Prepared by Lauren Mitchell and reviewed by editorial team.
The Trump administration and federal officials benefited in the short term because the appeals court stay preserved federal deployment authority and prevented immediate withdrawal of National Guard troops while appeals continue.
Local authorities in Washington, D.C., and state governors faced constrained control over National Guard forces, and affected communities experienced legal uncertainty about who directs security operations.
WATCH: National Guard is not Trump's 'private army,' California AG Bonta says after federal hearing
PBS.orgAppeals pause enflames dispute over National Guard deployments
WPDE 2 News Nevada EWN Traffic 2 News Nevada WPDE 2 News NevadaNo right-leaning sources found for this story.
Comments