The article argues that Israel's actions in Gaza meet the criteria for genocide, despite resistance from some governments and individuals. This resistance stems from Israel's history as a victim of genocide and a narrow understanding of the term 'genocide'. The author draws parallels to Rwanda, where genocide was followed by further atrocities under the guise of self-defense. Israel's actions, including the siege of Gaza and disregard for civilian life, are presented as fulfilling the requirements for genocide, even if not aiming to kill every Palestinian. The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) potential handling of the case is discussed, highlighting the challenge of proving genocidal intent and the need to clarify that forced displacement is not a defense against genocide charges.

Prepared by Rachel Morgan and reviewed by editorial team.