A debate rages over whether reviving US manufacturing can bridge the economic gap between prosperous "superstar" cities and struggling heartland communities. Economists like Gordon Hanson caution against a manufacturing "fetish", emphasizing the need for more broadly accessible good jobs. However, others, such as Oren Cass, argue that manufacturing's unique "tradable sector" status and local multiplier effect, particularly in advanced manufacturing, make it a crucial engine for regional economic growth, potentially attracting investment to less-developed areas. While the effectiveness of tariffs remains contentious, recent investments in new factories suggest government policies may be playing a role, though long-term impacts are still uncertain.

Prepared by Christopher Adams and reviewed by editorial team.